Whether the respondent LG Electronics Inc. aided in corrupt intent and racketeer influenced acts

Question Presented | Whether the respondent LG Electronics Inc. aided in corrupt intent and racketeer influenced acts.These actions being undoubtedly ignored over a course of time, prove to show signs of negligence and little to no remorse for the malice bestowed upon the petitioner Courtney Green. At the expense of The petitioners Character, were methods of unconsented surveillance in fact used to exploit, ' defame, profit, control and gather personal data for ulterior motives? Petition For Writ of Certiorari i Petitioner Courtney Green respectfully requests the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Decision Below The decision of the district of New Jersey is published in the third circuit | 2022. ) The decision of the United States Court of appeals is published at the third Circuit 2023. ) Jurisdiction Originally on 10/31/2022 The honorable Judge Susan D. Wigenton denied the appellees ; informa application to proceed without payment ordered Case 22-06057 Green v. LG Electronics USA Inc./LG Electronics be dismissed with prejudice. It was also implied in | the opinion of the courts that the appellee failed to state a valid argument in which relief could be granted.The district of New Jersey Third Circuit entered judgment 12/14/2022 for dismissal deeming the amended complaint was insufficient in stating a claim upon 2 i which relief may be granted because the claims outline do not permit to infer more than . the mere possibility of misconduct.A motion to vacate the order of dismissal and reinstate was submitted to the district courts November 7,2022 and was denied when the courts claimed the appellee still failed to state a valid argument in which relief could be granted. A notice of appeal was filed with the New Jersey District Court January 10,2023. On june 8,2023 the The court of appeals for the third circuit ordered and Adjudged that the decision of the New Jersey district court on January 4,2023 be | affirmed. | Federal Rule Involved Due to a manufacturing error and defects in the design of the respondent Lg electronics Inc. LG brand television media and network personnel were able to openly use spyware and other methods of electronic surveillance to collect data, eavesdrop and harass the petitioner; Enabling the act of Invasion of Privacy through the disclosure of private facts and intrusion of solitude, Illegal gathering and disbursement of private information. Through this the electronic communications privacy act, the stored | communications act,consumer privacy protections act, the cybersecurity information sharing act, as well as laws regarding racketeering, exploitation, defamation of character,malice and non consensual rights were | violated. Statement of Case | The respondent LG Electronics USA Inc./LG electronics Inc. Failed to | warn of possible electronic breach that lead to non consensual surveillance and provided a platform/portal for Employees of the entertainment and media 3 . industry to openly use methods of spyware and electronic surveillance to , i monitor, listen,survell and attempt to converse with and continuously gather and share data through the use of the television device capabilities. In doing | so, assailants were able to obtain television information such as model | number,Upc and other codes to track and collect viewing data and f manipulate and control viewing capabilities as well as limit viewing options | and even jam and disconnect network connections to specific network channels. Through this Design defect consecutively for 3 years beginning in 2020 Employees of the entertainment and media industry were able to use this platform to openly and facilitate the exchange of information to the masses for the purpose of malice towards the petitioner therefore aiding in the act of Racketeering and corrupt intent. I. Green’s circumstantial evidence shows that LG Electronics USA inc./LG electronics Inc. provided a pl