Did the respondent General mills use these findings to duplicate a breakfast creation for mass production of its breakfast cereal brand?

Question Presented . During August of 2020 through February of 2021 I, the plaintiff Courtney Green Purchased and used a combination of honey o’s, quaker bunches of oats granola and honey nut cheerios, cinnamon muffins and cinnamon tasty kake swirls | to create a personal mixture of cereal for my morning breakfast consumption.During August of 2020 through February of 2021 Mine eating habits were unknowingly being stalked and observed amongst other things. During this timeframe Daily I would purchase these products and eat them in the lodge area of a Price Chopper located at 16611 e 23rd Independence, Mo 64055.1 The plaintiff, Courtney Green express that beginning around the starting date of August of 2020 discovered amongst other events confirmed the notion that my eating and shopping habits were being monitored through means of in person stalking/people watching as well as methods of obtained surveillance Footage along with being watched through the television for purposes of collecting information and exploiting my daily living for profit. The respondent General Mills World HQ took advantage of collective methods of stalking in its various forms to conceal the act of partaking in exploiting the respondents personal culinary creations and intellectual property for financial gain. Through daily monitoring of the respondents shopping and eating choices, Did the respondent General mills use these findings to duplicate a breakfast creation for mass production of its breakfast cereal brand? Petition For Writ of Certiorari Petitioner Courtney Green respectfully requests the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Decision Below The decision of the district of Minnesota is published in the Eighth circuit 2022. The decision of the United States Court of appeals is published at the Eighth Circuit 2023. | | | Question Presented 2 : | Petition For Writ of Certiorari 2 Decision Below 2 : Jurisdiction 3 Federal Rule Involved 3 Statement of Case 4 1. Green’s circumstantial evidence shows that General Mills World HQ openly participated in... 4 Reasons For Granting the Writ | II. The United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit Ruled ... 7 | Unjust Enrichment 11 Terms and Conditions 12 Sec. 250.45 Untawful surveillance in the second degree 13 Consent 13 Non consensual monitoring and surveillance 14 Reasonable privacy 15 Eavesdropping 16 | Aggravated harassment 17 sy Reason for granting writ 18 Conclusion 19 Related Cases 21 Statues and Rules 21