Whether the trial court violated petitioner's right to be present, right to counsel, and right to self-representation when it improperly excluded petitioner from the trial during closing argument when he was representing himself

No question identified. : . (Questions Fresentedl TL. Diel The Teial Ceurt Violate Relihoners Right Te Be Mesent Right To Camel, Ane! | Right To SelfRepresentation When T+ Lproperly Excluolee! Ptitioner Fiom ‘The. Trial During Closing Argument shen He was Representing Hivnsel Anal Ther | Failed To Give The ery A Crate Lnsbretian Regarding His Bxcbsion® | | Pettoner 3 “Me | Preseeurtisns “Mo" , COA. 2 Failed To Pelyucticate | Ili 2 Faded! To Aelvetiaate | T. Was “The Relitioners Rah Te . We Tiel Onder gt Tar Motes Vieleded tier, Ber Being Remcnad Ec A | Neglected To File, Anol Serve, Ay Toh mahi Ane! 15-o0819-alFA; The Froseeution And, Jas The Potitionery Right Te Dee cos Fertig lo Cake Nomber 1S-cogil7-orFH. | Shen He Was Convicted! On Charges sob Filed on A Fe nae the Foutheenth Amendment Case Number 15-069119-4-FU3 Anel Coniiebed on v4, Inter mation In Relations Te | Case Mumber 1¢. ~CO7Y -6 bale . on Comp Jainants Not Charged In . Proseestion ton | mia > Failed ho Adheczate | S62 Failed TS Aol weltabe | dD. Was The E+ _ _ , Enterprise; () The Reople Filed] To Pocluce Ae pala Las ‘the Predlicale alense OF The Crimmnal | Redford Tocmship tthe Was The Only Complamna Teens a Seppert The Charged Offenses Against The Retitoner Held’ A Legal claimLn The Pare, her He ge! In The Informations (3 | Onl Entered Fer one Gunt of Fale Prods roper tres He kenteed; (i) And The Wial Cort | 15 -CO7YH-ol-FH, @ Iretenses For The Criminal Enterprise Tn Case llomber titioner 3 “Yes — Proseestions Kerer Answered | Cd.A, 2 “Wo | MS.E, 2 %AJa* |