No. 23-6218
Shaquille Dewayne Smith v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-statute due-process firearm-possession interstate-commerce new-york-state-rifle-pistol-association-v-bruen second-amendment standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-01-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment under New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 142 8. Ct. 2111 (2022). 2. Whether Congress may criminalize intrastate possession of a firearm solely because the firearm crossed state lines at some point before the defendant came to possess it. i
Docket Entries
2024-01-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
2023-12-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 10, 2024)
Attorneys
Shaquille Dewayne Smith
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent