Whether the petitioner was improperly denied reimbursement for durable medical equipment services

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a . | “recom chaapes are identical te Douid tox-Dubin | Should Z receive all of, ex of 1088 Acay(i) | Gif reveled belentity Koos a vracelef Pp | . . Cf. ” . / | Was ue jin of my Fraud.” “fous ” services cere vendered, | neillary fo wham ade the concact-prmlalenll ; | See: Di chael, SQ F. 3c, of 623-6] 7, | a Didnt my DME. Corporation have prior axthorizatiow | to biUl For the pabtercts’ DME, (Curble medical Equip) Dees Prpeldcabr (it become eVenm ; . , | eines 7 ore PSrVasive ! © Dawd tox Debin was Persecuted? | Hy he Same) KL A Kooy 6) he + prosecuted | ‘ OS , S 4m = = ‘ ' ! in the Same “by? J Same /) (steiot a, ae