Does the 'reasonable probability' standard, established in Brady v. Maryland, conflict with the 'clear and convincing evidence' criteria, defined under Sawyer v. Whitley, once a petitioner initially meets the high bar regarding a 28 U.S.C. §2244(b) application?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED FIRST QUESTION: Does the "“reassnable probabil ty Standard, established in Bradvy Vv. Maryland, conflict with the “clear and convincing evidence” criteria, detined under Sawyer v. White ty , , once a petitioner Ini tially meets the hiah bar : regarding a 28 U.S.¢. *2244 (6) app tiication ? SECOND QUESTION : Does the denial of a Certificate of Appealability application pursuant f 28 U.S.¢.*2253 (ed, contliet | with the Clear and convincing evidende | Standard, that was met by petitioner through gatekeepers 2? 7