Carmen A. Zammiello v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Securities
When will a state's 'substantive law' be applied in a federal court?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHEN WILL A STATES “SUBSTANTIVE LAW” BE APPLIED EN A FEDERAL COURT 7? 1. DOES THE. HISTORTC NATURE OF THE weir oF -HBBERS CORPUS , AND PRINCIPLES OF FEDERALISM PRECLUDE A FEDERAL CoURy's DIRECT INTERFERENCE Wirt A STATE COURTS MISCONDUCT OF-STATE LITIGATION FOR HABEAS RELTEF 2? he EN DECITOING ro. SSEE A WRQTT OF HABERS FOR A STATE PRISONER IMUST.A DISTRECT COURT DEAL WIT THE FOLLOWING THREE FACTORS: Ci) FEDERAL IAw, (a) STATE JAW AND (3) THE FACTS TO WHECH THE iaAw MUST BE REPITED 22 | i 4. WHEN THE CUMULATIVE CONSTITUTTONAL VrOLATIONS AND EARORS AT TRIAL DEPRIVES THE TURY OF CATTICAL EVIDENCE. THAT WOULD PROVE THE DEFENDANTS’ TNNOCENCE, “DOES THE USE OF AN. © EMPROPER STANDARD’ By BOTH THE COURT OF APPEALS AND THE DESTRECT COURT, REQUIRE PROPERLY BALANCED DICTATES OF JUSTICE. Yo. DECIDE WHETHER A FUNDAMENTAL MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE EXCEPTYON APPLTES 22