Whether a trial judge's sua sponte actions create the appearance of partiality

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; = Lshether intended or net dots atcial judge aive the appearanct. oF parhality by tring sua sponte actions in anor of the siole? a _ , Ts ita structucal dé&ect in atvial When the judge expresses his ‘Peeling Hhot he neds te lord over tt ON. To moxke sure it dessnt get seretutd Lp and having te covesVor people |? Lahen a. Prosecutor sho Gormmils misconduct & clishonesty, . dece'tt, and Praud on tne court in Yoad Sain; does it CEquIve 0. dismissal ine changes unde tre. double “gooandy close ? (ES a nets deial ceguired ssnen “he tral. court's Pailure te hold 0. Ridhosdl3en hgaring 1s inthe belie? Pe trol yudee? moy . rus exist 7 | . Dees o. prosecutor have a continued dotiaction ts disclose ‘Vaueroie tone aocused’ evidence bs Ye, defense in atimely Foshiion“nod makes it oP valu tothe accused, even in a. Notice Se Expiration or Seedy Trial time. Qtsied ? , DES A yucor rho EXPrESES thokrtney have an extaydidal Concecnstrak may Keeo them distracted From hearing testimony } Corattide structural Exrac? . wes atfial pudae Lahe culiS on a dSenst. motion bSore the : dé&ense presents ‘it shows parhality Por tne stode, Line : beasts Prom the culing ? A latsver lsh aboanclens a client on aoozal tec it} isas |. P Pec Curium AtPiemscl and dors Either Sale an cthtaring oF hs Lattndrans from tad cases Causing tne clients olan makions in Pro-Stto be shieKén, dus to having Couns’), mor adephng . Wis Blienls motion, Constrhte inePechue assistance. of | Agpellode. counsel ? Ts ta constihtione] vielation Yor appellale counsel tp nat sso Vundamental ercortnod is. Strongér than the issues coased, by counsel, ( ; | |