No. 23-6259
Bryan Lee Ogle v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aggravated-assault armed-career-criminal-act criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction most-innocent-conduct sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation tennessee-statute violent-felony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-01-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in applying an enhanced sentence, pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), to Mr. Ogle at sentencing
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the district court erred in applying an enhanced sentence, pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), to Mr. Ogle at sentencing. Mr. Ogle asks this Court to review whether Tennessee’s statute for aggravated assault, T.C.A. § 39-13-102, qualifies as a violent felony predicate under the Armed Career Criminal Act. i Il. LIST OF ALL
Docket Entries
2024-01-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
2023-12-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 16, 2024)
Attorneys
Bryan Lee Ogle
Paul E Stroebel — Stroebel & Stroebel, Petitioner
Paul E Stroebel — Stroebel & Stroebel, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent