No. 23-6260
Charles E. Linder, Jr. v. Kenneth Black, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure detective-testimony evidence evidentiary-objection firearm ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment testimony witness-credibility
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-01-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether trial counsel was ineffective in violation of the Sixth Amendment due to failure to object to testimony
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Trial counsel was ineffective in violation of his Sixth Amendment right under the US Constitution due to his failure to: (1) object to Detective Reese's testimony about his belief that Linder was not under the influence of PCP at the time of the interview and testimony that he had the ability to tell if someone is lying. 2. There was insufficient evidence that Linder used a firearm during the l alleged crimes since no firearm was recovered, not all witnesses reported seeing a firearm, and no testing was conducted on the bullet casing. | 2 ‘ {
Docket Entries
2024-01-16
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2024.
2023-12-22
Waiver of right of respondent Kenneth Black to respond filed.
2023-12-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 16, 2024)
Attorneys
Kenneth Black
Michael Jason Hendershot — Ohio Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Michael Jason Hendershot — Ohio Attorney General's Office, Respondent