No. 23-6267

Jose Gonzalez, III v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2023-12-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mccoy-precedent right-to-counsel right-to-remain-silent sixth-amendment trial-procedure
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is McCoy v Louisiana a logical extension of Florida V Nixon when concession of Petitioner's guilt was never discussed prior to trial?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1). Is McCoy v Louisiana a logical extension of Florida V Nixon at all when concession of Petitioner's guilt was never disSussed prior to trial? ! 2). Does adjudicating a McCoy claim as one of ineffective assistance of counsel amount to any meaningful adjudication of a McCoy claim? 3). After a not guilty plea, does requiring basically an "outburst" objection to preserve a McCoy claim violate a defendant's Fifth Amendment right to remain silent while refusing to admit guilt during trial?

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 16, 2024)

Attorneys

Jose Gonzalez
Jose Gonzalez — Petitioner