No. 23-6282
Clay Chastain v. Bedford Regional Water Authority
IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-law due-process equal-protection judicial-review legal-procedure public-utility rate-regulation statutory-interpretation takings
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Can a Locality practice uniformly and selectively charge K Lucho mecs J: Lhe ant fove © Marian he susan all the Custome zc use ¢
2. Does sudan av iuvalo © unutitsan Rounyg Seneating Dla violate He "Faun! tetechin Chau!
3. CWT Uk Pathe charge <yb-dof Custorrens aN exo SSO. Un af rdabb ant) Un Redsoudhb Cannechan ve c
4. Caw a ubldy Pacthiwity be estab {eb Hak is Aecountabk 43 none ofhen than i tse] L-?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the utility doctrine uniformly and selectively charges customers for the costs of serving them
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-11-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2024)
Attorneys
Clay Chastain
Clay Chastain — Petitioner