No. 23-6283
Stacy Anthony Mitchell v. Arkansas
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: choice-of-counsel constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process indigent-defendant right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-court-discretion
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a trial court's denial of an indigent criminal defendant's choice of privately retained counsel, who is ready, willing, and able to proceed to trial without delay, violate the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of the right to counsel of one's choice?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does a trial court’s denial of an indigent criminal defendant’s choice of privately retained counsel, who is ready, willing, and able to proceed to trial without delay, violate the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of the right to counsel of one’s choice? ray STATEMENT OF
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-04
Waiver of right of respondent Arkansas to respond filed.
2023-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2024)
Attorneys
Arkansas
Stacy A. Mitchell
William O. James — The James Law Firm, Petitioner
William O. James — The James Law Firm, Petitioner