No. 23-6293

Shallon Hawkins v. David Vandergriff, Warden

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-12-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: actual-innocence civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-admissibility habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel motion-to-suppress newly-discovered-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct trial-court
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-04-26 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the United States District Court err by denying my claims for procedural default relief under Schlup, Glenn, fundamental fairness, newly discovered evidence, or actual innocence?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : i ‘ | | | , ; P, ton bo, (4 of Cerdiorari 7 i ; | OQnestions Prsenteel fy Review ” u Re fe Wet? Quest.ons | Did the inked Seles Disc Gu emo, by denying my Clams hr pracetrel defaulier tl rue thon, under Nociner, Glenn furstamental Fcnesy Vewly Ascoveresl ev. ctenee,or celal sanoc ence? bd desc ane, : be “prod enol 2415 Counseles) Comad attorney erro or were They rarclepeet e ons! inefbect.ve ens! wes ‘ ites so Meiad pod on jurd Gouse fee procedurel defauld n tbe Messow Cad of peels 26S, dired egpod, lu 225 AL all Claas IMA was Peeved sm te B05 2ies a demel of ccerss focowels ond counsel by tae . Depeclmenl ef Carrechons geoterjus Cnt foe procedunl fants? 2 te griccnt preccers ev dente . Wal quel erongle or dabn mgood fdlh Could This Cowl soy tis action al held a devel firs 1488 cul . hight scompinad? Dil dhe Couct error by dsayy ean cllomey ant cv exbrory herning te sleres fleece? Steenbl tees have been gpenbed <3 wail as dle ober ES IH Guayicdam sdasitte onl correded? : . | Wasdevel cunnsel considedonsly ineffedWe fr Patong fy ab;cel a ot hay er dal regeciting enrditory brdlice repacted on Ad insteections e-vnst actions wh affect evdeace fo Suga the nst actos on las redlins Leceusstle aants of relfdclense, defense of'pers ony Ae Aucciliy balay or vehicle act.dler ie serine of peson 20, d teeal Cod erren by aah gunn those seane instructions Heol wes taadelory cbether rege Hed . . i" ted or culls cad coderce fo Sypen Ie unst ractions > Wes alirced aw! 265 Connectors Const fintonely oneftegeole : . prt caeffecdue & Cilog be raise te coved erreg,inellectwe exs-stonce of Fecal ond eftred aypee| crass onal to . Fre Heated! of Apcllensl mn teere raped ¢ Gppeals? _ ; | Can dhs Stale of Messer Suppress co-cerce benctierel te me by Filing ty prou-de me and ny alforncy , ~ tedence Tooke brecdbaly ter derd m Hanser Cdy Peles Deped mend Zed ths wolete te confrotedisn: ne ; louse, Massenes Sunshine law or Bray because Kanses Cl, Pal.ce Dyged mori ded nol receal a brecttraly rem fest tele w. Kenses (Ay Police Depecd a onl > Shaud Z hase been ger en ceaduary hewnry? : | Ded devel Goud error by foreing me foivears leg brace restraunt Had wes “Lon-ysiblet er Uns He? Pref he eae aren by Faling te have shearing Ker access My or tah om recoodd hrm revicosay Cour be decile t wwe me ant preseedl Wes devel ineffective by (esling ts abjecd te the use 4S the “‘wesvsibleer v5 be bey. Ce es pericwnd 2 Wes tis an ompledum of qu'ld by my Horney ond! Coach? Wes.ch'eced cath 28S Gans eles) ra t a i : ‘rand egual cand indlectoe hr bastony le pase the Cond ene, sncHleclate assistonce of tetal counsil or inellecue aescslonce of dlicetl syed! Cons Clnims onal fo the Heudord of Sleickland va there refpectve sppeclslssue 4 2 CQuestrows 1 Wes F proved nllecdite ois. tones of deal counsel fe fog te c2!l Cay the arty erdnas oh my behell to destly 2 uks 2905 consid constfistaonsly srdVecd we bar Fuitug be ruse,cr better ress ths due nM PS end tothe slanserdt ef SlecK lad 7 : 1 Ssue gS: Quest.» ns Was Arch eaansil amel lective +-commst etlemry error by ovedteckory te mssing antl added porlan isAele eahitt Sih bo Lelong te objecl ty Is adnssicn of all sages” Did tal ca eorar by Meany foe sdnssion of thet eahhd SKi , nts beigl over delenses objecdin hae did make? Was chr eh and 25S counsel CSdiand epaade cal ndfecdve tr fal b Ceose Laed error, inctledive oss.sence af fecal caasclend snadeguele ond cncMfectde assistance of dbirecd syped! Geansel chins bebe slortod ef Hncltonl on these respoctuc seals 7 Shntd F have bees goes an cued ech nary here sing &, slele exhibit s/58? | Issue 6° Queshons . Wes T pres .ded sa cblecttio: asssdoree of fecsl Counsel Re fetay Yo aged to oF seyue aalhple pount> -deal ‘end for objec in, am cegeds To inad massebhe fesdmenies 0+ opens the door dotestmnoues of Aecesy ont tpecnlehve kpineen est owntes, cal eypmed or eal topinerd teshmoutes,cighlte ronan sleol test tyne as en enped wane” Ded . devel Out gerer by allo

Docket Entries

2024-04-29
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-04-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-03-04
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-03-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2024)

Attorneys

Shallon Hawkins
Shallon Hawkins — Petitioner