No. 23-6294

Gregory I. Ezeani v. Bridgett Kelly, Union County College Human Resources Division

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2023-12-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process employment-records impersonation legal-procedure privacy privacy-rights subpoena subpoena-fraud unlawful-search
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Related Cases: 23-6237 (Vide) 23-6295 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the pro se's constitutional rights under the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments were violated by the unauthorized disclosure of his personal employment records to the opposing attorney without his consent

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED ' i Briefly, the case originates from a case of Ezeani V Anderson V CFG health system (case | No:23-1187) because the defense attorney of CFG health system (Mr. Jeffrey McClains) contracted by Anderson of Essex county correction department engaged into falsification of . subpoena using the act of impersonation as an officer of New Jersey District court instead . of a practicing attorney to serve subpoena to Union county college and Essex county college requesting all employment record of the pro se without pro se consent from former | employer where the pro se worked as an adjunct instructor at business department teaching | undergraduate business student in 2021. The Essex.County college refused to send out the ‘ pro se all employment document because the employee never consents to the request, and Essex County college regard it as a forged document that does not bear the address of New Jersey district court even though it was presented as if it was issued by New Jersey district court. Union county college human resources search and produce all employment document that stop working with the institution since 2021 and forwarded all employment record of the pro se to the defendant attorney (Mr Jeffrey McClains) as he requested in the subpoena without the consent of the pro se. The human resources department of union county college : provided the attorney with the pro se academic master transcripts degrees from different university which contain the pro se social security numbers, date of births, academic grades Pro se master’s degree certificates, Pro se resume, marital status, pay stub etc. The attorney went on to use the document to file a request to obtain a third deposition in a medical case I 1 of Ezeani V. Anderson v CFG health (case No:23-1187) asking the pro se to provide school | fees receipt on how he paid for those university master studies in United States, pro se IRS record, marital status and divorce record in other to help the attorney to pursue delay of the medical malpractice case of Ezeani v. Anderson v. CFG health system. The Pro se filed a lawsuit at New jersey district court against the human resources manager of union county college for federal privacy right violation because the pro se stop working with the university since 2021 and the pro se never consent to provide any portion or all his entire employment history to anyone starting from the time he starts the adjunct teaching job to end of the time he works with the institution. The institution provided the pro se all employment history to the attorney in 2022 without the pro se consent which is unlawful search and seizure of the | pro se record that violate due process right of the pro se constitutional right to 4th, 5th, gth and 14th amendment constitutional right. Moreover, the pro se filed a lawsuit for privacy right violation and the district court issued a summons to the human resources manager to answer the pro se complaint. The attorney of the union county human resources failed to respond to the court summons to answer the lawsuit filed by the pro se on violation of federal privacy protection right (Exhibit 1A showing summon issued by the district court). The defendant attorney filed motion asking for extension then the district judge now see that the defendant did not answer the summon after the clerk entered default then decided to dismiss the case on the grounds that the lawsuit suppose to be file with the first case of Ezeani V. Anderson V. CFG health system (Case No:23-1187) because it originated from the case. (See Exhibit ZA showing the defendant attorney motion asking for extension). The pro se filed an appeal to the third circuit court for abuse of discretion by the . district court that violates due process right because the human resource manager violated | . . 1 the pro se privacy right to retrieve the employment record of a former employer without | consent and provide it to Mr. Jeffrey McClains after he used

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-09-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2024)

Attorneys

Gregory I. Ezeani
Gregory Ifesinachi Ezeani — Petitioner