No. 23-6296

Charles Andre Bailey v. Dennis Bley

Lower Court: Oregon
Docketed: 2023-12-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: ada-violation civil-rights death-certificate fraud government-violation health-insurance medical-fraud medical-records physician-patient-relationship qui-tam
Key Terms:
Environmental
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why did Dr. Bley sign my father's death certificate if he claims he's not his doctor?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : oo i" WHY DID DR. BLEY SIGN MY FATHER’S DEATH CERTIFICATE [F HE CLAIMS HESNOTHIS DOCTOR? © : , WHY IS DR. BLEY’s NAME ON MY FATHER’S HEALTH INSURANCE POLICY? AS PRIMARY DOCTOR? IF HE : CLAIMS HE WASN'T MY FATHER’s PHYSICIAN? . _'WHY DID DR. BLEY CLAIM MY FATHER HAD PROSTATE CANCER FOR 12 YEARS? a MY FATHER’s MEDICAL PAPERWORK FROM JANUARY 30, 2021, ON BACK 12 YEARS PRIOR FORETOLD MY , , FATHER’s PROSTATE BIOPSY NEGATIVE! PLEASE, | ASK DR. BLEY? ..HOW DID YOU COME UP WITH YOUR : DIAGNOSIS? . . oo 7 an THE CONTRACT DR. BLEY SIGNED STATES: HE WASN'T MY FATHER’S DOCTOR? MEDICAL PAPERWORK a . SUPPORTS NO PROSTATE CANCER WITHOUT DR. BLEY’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT? BUT, WHY NO IMPRINT? . BUT, THE DOCTOR'S SIGNATURE? & TITLE ARE ALL OVER MY FATHER'S HEALTH BENEFITS? THAT'S A GOVERNMENT VIOLATION FCA! CLAIMS MADE BY INDIVIDUAL FRAUDULENT! DOES DR. BLEY? BIASK ; THIS QUESTION TOWARDS HIM? HIS ATTORNEY? & OREGON SUPREME COURT? CITATION# __*:249us219(1911) BAILEY v. ALABAMA, DO YOU KNOW HE COMMITTED FRAUD??? WHY DID OREGON SUPREME COURT VIOLATE ADA (AMERICAN DISABILITY ACT)? WHEN MY WAIVER oo ; GOT SUPPORT FROM OREGON CIRCUIT COURT, BUT, THE HIGHER COURTS COMMITED AN VIOLATION, IS IT BECAUSE IM NOLONGER AN OREGIAN? OR IS IT BECAUSE 1M BLACK & LEGAL? & DON’T FIT STANDARDS BECAUSE OF THE RACIAL TENSION IN OREGON STATE? = 7 : , _ WHY OREGON CIRCUIT COURT APPLIED MY WAIVER? & OREGON SUPREME COURT DID.NOT? ALSO, & PLEASE ANSWER, AM i WRONG FOR EXCERCISING MY RIGHTS UNDER (QUI’TAM) SUING , ‘ . BECAUSE OF GOVEREMENT FRAUD? Fe WHY THE COURT DIDN’T USE DISCIPLINE WHEN MAIL FRAUD/MAIL TAMPERING OCCURRED WHEN MY MAIL WENT MISSING IN REPLY OF THE COURT? ° : ’ WHY WHEN USPS MADE AN INVESTIGATION & GAVE-ME THE CULPRIT’s NAME, THE COURT & CLERK : DENIED EVEN KNOWING THE PERSON? & AGAN, NO DISCIPLINE ACTION WAS MADE? a WHY WAS MY CASE THROWN OUT TWICE BETWEEN APPEALS & SUPREME COURT WHEN THE COURT _ KNEW OF MAILTAMPERING/MAIL FRAUD, EVEN AFTER USPS INVESTIGATION? & ALSOFBI _ {NVESTIGATION? . . , . | . UST OF PARTIES Se A parties appear Ie the, caption of the rage um the cover page. : . aa All pevtties de nat appent in the vaptints of the case on the cover page A list of | ae -" (all parties te the proceeding in Uhe onurt whose judgment ty the subject of hin . : ; . petition is ag Pollowas toe . . oe uo ee RELATED CASES oo Ce | . . : 4M PRBLE OF CONTENTS . oo OPINIONS | ee “DROTON penned re CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED mmm . : oo a

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-08-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2024)

Attorneys

Charles Bailey
Charles Bailey — Petitioner
Charles Bailey — Petitioner