Robert Lee Crawford v. United States
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Is the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment violated when a prisoner's 28 USC §2255 habeas corpus raising Second and Sixth Amendment claims is denied without a hearing?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED A. Is the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment violated by the : lower courts when a prisoner petitioner's 28 USC §2255 habeas corpus : raising Second and Sixth Amendment claims is denied by "preliminary ; review" without a hearingdenial alleges no constitutional violations : occurredwhen the courts recognize a constitutional Second Amendment claim in a subsequently filed Writ of Coram Nobis and appointed counsel for that separate filing when the original filing contained the strongest issues and the Second Amendment claim preventing the : prisoner from developing the Sixth Amendment claim with counsel? B. Is the Fourteenth Amendment violated when an inmate petitioner is : physically restrained from any access to legal papers, files, copy : machine, or case notes due to being on COVID-19 quarantine during the 28 day response deadline-inmate received the order with only 12 days left to respond pursuant to Rule 59(e) he had just started quarantinewhen the: court did not allow any time to account for the impediment suffered by the inmate on quarantine? : Note to the Honorable Court: Petitioner is an inmate and not trained in the law, the questions above may not apply the proper legal theory or : sufficiently address the proper Due Process clause as one is also : attached to the Fifth Amendment as well. Petitioner believes that the following Motion and