No. 23-6307
Veronica McCluskey v. William Hendricks, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure cross-examination due-process fair-hearing jury-trial legal-conduct reversible-error standing trial-court witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-trial-court-committed-reversible-error-in-not-granting-respondent-a-jury-trial
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; 1. The Court Should Grant Review To Clarify ! Whether The Trial Court Committed ' Reversible Error In Not Granting ! Respondent A Jury Trial In The First Instance 2. Whether Petitioner’s Due Process Rights ‘ : Were Violated When The Trial Court : Prevented Petitioner From A Fair Hearing i : In Limiting Cross-Examination Of William Hendricks Hlegal Conduct 3. An Important Question Exists Whether | Petitioner’s Due Process Rights Were Violated When The Trial Court Limited Cross Examination Of William Hendricks
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-02
Waiver of right of respondent William Hendricks and Roxanne Hendricks to respond filed.
2023-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2024)
Attorneys
Veronica McCluskey
Veronica McCluskey — Petitioner
William Hendricks and Roxanne Hendricks
Kathrin A. Wanner — Miller I Wanner LLP, Respondent