No. 23-6308
Ariel Garcia-Pelico v. Nebraska
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel investigative-procedures judicial-discretion motion-to-reopen procedural-fairness sixth-amendment strickland-v-washington
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Were the trial counsel's actions below the Strickland v. Washington standards?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \. TL wryurd LIKE To Know Were ok Nor Teac | ArPcuere CouNSEL'S ActotS Fee Baow THe 0-3 vu CRonic Sanmeos ? 2.T wos Lice To Kwow WaetHat of Not Tewr/Amuare CousiSer's Actions Far Berow The Speicecau v. Wasting tow Stan DARDS? BZ Was Tie Qupae's Actions Doan fa Tei InpeoPeeuy FAvoe THE Paosecotion IN Auowin@ To ReOpen mests % H Was my AH" Amammen Rents Viocared Niel The TRA Covet Aske Question’ To He fpasecuTi On * c 5. Dip My Tear] APreLATE ComiSécs ActioNS FALL Berow THE MSHEZ ¥. GiBSoN STANDARDS?
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2024)