No. 23-6329

Russell G. Finnegan v. David L. Chidester

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-12-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appeals appellate-review civil-procedure court-fees due-process in-forma-pauperis judicial-procedure jurisdiction pro-se-litigation signature-requirement standing
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Are the orders from the Court of Appeals valid absent an authorized signature of a judicial officer?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Are tHe orders from tee Court ot Agoeals valid absent an . authorized Signature ofa Sutera! officer 7 2. Te the Seventh CircoitCort of Agoeal's Joiniaa ja Newla V. Helman, 123 F.3d 424, 434 (74 Lb, 1997) cantrary ve law of 28 USL. Se. JUS? 3, Did I fal to ideahity a good Fath sve ia my meroradum fa sygpock oF motion tar feave. 7p proceed oa aqeal th Forma Payper's ? 4 Dil He Dstt Cart with debberate. sid Feyene. contrary fo its own holdings disallow me an gor ten ty ia] amend my camplant-P ) 5. tow can one be charged a Fibra fee lor an ygoed! . Hat was never Filed Pe J ci 6, Wht is He Filing tee. far IF xo agneal was Fred? 7 will the Sepreme Court if I am denied leave 1 | Forma parperi's on certiorari and can not pay the Filiag Tee order me to pay it anyway ater certiorari’ /'s Cevied with the came QpinioA of 26 UWS.C. Sec. 1V5 as the 7*%Cib. interprers Ht wit Newla V. Helman, /2.3 Fi 3d 429, Y34 (74Chn /997) ©

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-11-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 22, 2024)

Attorneys

Russell G. Finnegan
Russell Grant Finnegan — Petitioner
Russell Grant Finnegan — Petitioner