Does habeas corpus stand to correct the abuse of process involved in deliberate deception of a court by presentation of known false evidence?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ‘ ; 1. Does habeas corpus stand to correct the abuse of process : involved in deliberate deception of a court by presentation of . known false evidence?) 99> 0 8 ee "2. Does a criminal defendant meet the threshold requirement . to trigger a Barker. v. Wingo. analysis where he asserts that the. prosecution took double the customary time to try tase?Bo 3. Does a state appellate court decide the issue of sufficient evidence contrary to Federal law when it relies on a subjective determination of. guilt pursuant to corroboration and ignores the exculpatory currency of a children services": report? “-Furthermoré, are merged offenses, which do not receive prison term, included in a Jackson v. Virginia analysis? . , 4. Does a state court's imposition of a greater penalty than what the law annexed to it at commission violate the Constitution . and is habeas corpus capable of correcting such? a 5. Where a state ruled its registration requirements are penal, and must be imposed at the sentencing hearing and made a part of punishment, does imposition of such punishment upon merged offenses violate the Double Jeopardy Clause that is correctable via federal habeas corpus? . .