Questions Presented

No question identified. : oo Queshions Presented ee Vader U.S. Constikubion Amendient(s) 4 andor 5, andor, andor __\4. dors co defendant have aight bo oO. eis_deio\ wos my cight@) videted? zs ) Under US Conshitehon Mavtadmeat() U, andor S,dindof G,ancec —lH_mod_ Strickland v. Washington doeso defendant have the eighh te eRrective ASSSkante. o& Countel ond the riot to » have Counsel? Was my ——cight@)-vielabed? 3) Under US Constitution Rmeadment(s) 4 andor 5, andor 6, andor _ _\4 does _prosecutoria\ wi Sconduct violake a defendants eight too Fair trigl® was ray _ciaht(s) violated? oe ~4Y tinder US canstibition andorbcacd oc. }A_is ne government cequiced to oreserve evidence Haat mi wk be expected tp play a Signficaat cole ia the defendants Tenet Was ny ght (3) violated? _5) |_ Under US. Conskitution Amend ent(S) Sond or @, aad 068.14 com +he ——rodecubion challtnse o yuror on 4 kine bo asiS_of cace or gendéc? Bad nd white conducting ne 3rd _ Step of Batson (Juror Comporision),Can a a ——Hispoait_ Tuer whom wos _clrelleaged by te peesecotion he Compacedl to rN Afei can American jutor wikh Similac charactecistics whom wos _ net challenged by the prosecution | Was nny nn art (s) violated? _ 6) |_Under_Mactiner vBean con a defendant overcome procedural _—defoulks do to ineectwe assiskane of “Taal Counsel end gosk > Convickion celiet counsel? Was my rignt(s) violated? ae eee VY Undec Riley vi Californians QO vs. \ is 4HH97 and U.S. Constitukion Amendment 4 and doe process coes_a defendant have the cight against UAreasonable Searches ond SevauceS with lack of plobable couse, _ ond lock of particularity and lack of \ogical nexus? Was any cight@) violated ? Rn tee _ 8) under US. constitution Amendment 4 aad or 5 and or © and oc \4. does Judicial Wiis conduct Violate « defendants cignt te fair -tcial? Was my _ 4) Under U5. constitution Amendment 4, andor 5, ondoc_&, aad or \4, does 7 a defendant who skands tna by J have_+he eight yo Pooper yey instructions? Was my ight ahead!