No. 23-6349
Derrick Martin King v. Budget Car Mart, LLC
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights covid-19 due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment pandemic remote-depositions
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Supreme Court of Ohio's administrative orders necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic regarding the use of remote depositions violates a civil litigant's constitutional right to access to the courts and due process of law under the First and Fourteenth Amendments
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Supreme Court of Ohio’s administrative orders . necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic regarding the use of remote depositions violates a civil litigant’s constitutional right to access to the courts and due process of law under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. : \ i
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-22
Waiver of right of respondent Budget Car Mart, LLC to respond filed.
2023-12-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 25, 2024)
Attorneys
Budget Car Mart, LLC
Kristopher Blaine Immel — Roderick Linton Belfance LLP, Respondent
Kristopher Blaine Immel — Roderick Linton Belfance LLP, Respondent