No. 23-6353
Robert John Virnig v. Minnesota
IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment agency exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment government-informant home-office probable-cause search-and-seizure warrant-requirement warrantless-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment
FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-02-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District Court err in ruling that the government informant was not acting as an agent of the government when, without a warrant or an exception to the warrant requirement, informant took a photograph of, and searched, the Petitioner's home office?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did the District Court err in ruling that the government informant was not acting as an agent of the government when, without a warrant or an exception to the warrant requirement, informant took a photograph of, and searched, the Petitioner's home office?
Docket Entries
2024-02-26
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2023-08-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 25, 2024)