Did the district court err when it denied the original complaint without a hearing, and concluding appellant had no cause of action?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR WHEN IT DENIED THE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT WITHOUT A HEARING, AND _ CONCLUDING APPELLANT HAD NO CAUSE OF ACTION? 2. DID THE LOWER COURT ERR OR ABUSE ITS DISCRETION WHEN DENYING THE MOTION TO AMEND? 3. IS IT DESIREABLE OR IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST TO CONSIDER A CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIM WHERE FOOD PROVIDERS KNOW OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THEY WERE FEEDING THE INMATES WITH PEANUT BUTTER WITH ACRYLAMIDE, WHICH CAUSES CANCER AND LEAD POISONING? 244)