Does the Common-Law exception recognized in State ex rel. Richards v. Foust abridge the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of a litigant?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED @ 1. Does the Common-Law exception recognized in State ex rel. Richards v. Foust that doesn’t require a response from a Records Custodian to a public records request abridge the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of a litigant? A. Does Due Process require a Court to conduct an In Camera review of requested ‘ records. . 2. Does the Wisconsin Supreme Court's decision in State ex rei. Richards v. Foust conflict with this Court's decision in Missouri v. Frye, that held formal plea offers and negotiations must be made part of the record? A. Does a prosecutor waive their qualified privilege derived from the attorney workproduct doctrine if both parties concede a final plea offer was made? ek _..,,