Christopher J. Barnett v. David Guten, District Judge, District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma
Securities
Whether the judge's bias against the petitioner justifies recusal and whether the court's denial of access to the courts based on the petitioner's indigent pro se status violates the Constitution
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a NMY 4 Judge Cowtinue fo Rule then bly oe him From hearing AB pos$ CONV ICH On BPP CALS ON . her . , Where the Tudee has "Ade Bias Shot mew Ie 0 We tds The feriticwef? MAY The Cny §Acce ; a ‘Sa a) is Course becaue. +h 2 LedHiver iS EM digent Fro Se, Ducatcerptea Aasl YAS ann 7 WAY 0 Ob tein op Certitied Ladkt oder whew TRE District Courk Judge [Davio A. Guten | Deaied The pasitioner § Metitn for CéerkiFréd Court Order So be may Fie. A mAndames For Sudge Dpwd Gutens Rev spe? Ls The occas PONY Denying AlcéS po the Colts baSe d on LN Pent COMSHEUFM ONAL ?