No. 23-6389
Michael Lavern Boyd v. Lay, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process legal-provisions medical-care petition prison supreme-court writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-02-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the denial of access to medical supplies that are necessary to avoid severe pain and suffering violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED —_ tH, 4 Crustal Rarctetinerk To Gerted® tate MeOoal SuPPles Thhak le vee ot Trebek, oy ‘ wet QUESTBVO Wowletz 1% Tt post Wit pas “A \leostony “Pouckk “The Supplies a woe orien Tb OO” Leas “yYertaticus, tO SUG ZoO TROsteS u \o ‘ 12> rrecdecd’ is iN & QuestiovO ums Se Sb orvook Heltoensbe Vu pSWerence Yo we cimnwte ViolAtes Eqytt Pate rDy ee ct Lethareritsy UDdbbeLO Sta Sao Se Creel peu Unusust ‘Vues 46% nee,
Docket Entries
2024-02-26
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2024-01-22
Waiver of right of respondents Tracy Bennett, Angela Mixon and Angela Davis to respond filed.
2023-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 29, 2024)
Attorneys
Tracy Bennett, Angela Mixon and Angela Davis
Kynda Almefty — Hardin, Jesson & Terry, PLC, Respondent
Kynda Almefty — Hardin, Jesson & Terry, PLC, Respondent