No. 23-6394
Andrew Tablack v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 21-usc-841 controlled-substance controlled-substances criminal-law criminal-procedure drug-offense federal-statute indictment indictment-defect scheduling statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is there a legal element in 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1) that requires the CDS named in the indictment to be listed on the Controlled Substance Schedules at the time of the alleged offenses?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED | \.) Is there & leaal element in Zi U.9.c. BU©L) : thot requires the Ors, Named in the indictment to be listed on the Controlled substance, schedules ° a) At the Hime of the adleagd offenses, 1s the omission oF A" Controlled Sulostance” Grom ZV OSC. BAVAQLY a Latal defeck ta the indictmenté 3) Does the teem “Corrtralled substance orale \eop\ty exclude. & SUG, thot became scheduled OS & Controlled substance following, the period F alleged ochvity? x
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-19
Application (23A661) denied by Justice Alito.
2024-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-02
Application (23A661) for bail, submitted to Justice Alito.
2023-12-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 29, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent