Imre Kifor v. Massachusetts, et al.
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA FirstAmendment DueProcess
Is the mandate to selectively 'advance equity' (for a select few) Constitutional?
ESTIONS PRESENTED ' : fue e$ 230 | | 1) The “Sec. 8. Affirmatively Advancing Civil Rights ... to prevent and address discrimination and advance equity for all” clause of the 2/16/2023 Presidential Executive Order! results in the predictable “equity for the rich or equity for the poor mother?” dilemma as “equity for all” is impossible by Marxist design. Is the mandate to selectively “advance equity” (for a select few) Constitutional? 2) Does sovereign immunity apply to an “LGBTQ+” Massachusetts when using federal funds to subsidize the forceful separation and alienation of innocent American children from their loving American parents? ! See -ii