No. 23-640
Caleb A. C. Smith v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: 10th-circuit declarant-memory evidence-rule evidence-rules excited-utterance hearsay-exception memory military-rules-of-evidence statement-admissibility testimonial-evidence unpublished-decision
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-01-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a statement made hours after an alleged assault is admissible as an excited utterance?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a statement, made hours after an alleged assault that the declarant has no memory of, is admissible as an excited utterance?
Docket Entries
2024-01-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
2023-12-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2024)
2023-10-10
Application (23A291) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 9, 2023.
2023-09-29
Application (23A291) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 10, 2023 to December 9, 2023, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Caleb A. C. Smith
Heather Marie Caine — US Air Force, Petitioner
Heather Marie Caine — US Air Force, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent