No. 23-6406

Jamal Eberhardt v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-court-standard criminal-procedure due-process excessive-sentence judicial-discretion reasonableness-standard sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-review third-circuit
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Third Circuit error by not finding Mr. Eberhardt's sentence was harsh and excessive?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Did the Third Circuit error by not finding Mr. Eberhardt’s sentence was harsh and excessive. i

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-12-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 2, 2024)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisProof of ServiceOtherPetitionMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisProof of ServiceOther

Attorneys

United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent