No. 23-6407
Nira Woods v. Department of Housing and Community Development, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process federal-constitution federal-procedure interlocutory-order judicial-review standing state-court state-courts
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-05-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the Existence of the State Courts Interlocutory Order(s) in this case impairs/offense/invalidate my Federal Constitution and Due processes?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : Question 1: Is the Existence of the State Courts Interlocutory Order(s) in this case : ; impairs / offense / invalidate my Federal Constitution and Due processes ? Question 2: ; . Is the Existence of the State Courts Interlocutory OPINION in this case impairs / offense / invalidate Federal Constitution and Due processes ? Question 3: ; Is the Existence of the State Courts Interlocutory Exhibits in this case impairs / offense / invalidate Federal Constitution and Due processes ?
Docket Entries
2024-05-13
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-02-26
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-26
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2024-01-19
Waiver of right of respondents City of Torrance (erronously sued as Torrance Police Department and Department of Mental Health City of Torrance) and Jon Megeff to respond filed.
2024-01-10
Waiver of right of respondents N & K Commercial Property, Inc., Ken Miyake, Victor Guzman and Manuel Guzman to respond filed.
2023-12-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 2, 2024)
Attorneys
City of Torrance (erronously sued as Torrance Police Department and Department of Mental Health City of Torrance) and Jon Megeff
N & K Commercial Property, Inc., Ken Miyake, Victor Guzman and Manuel Guzman
Rick L. Peterson — Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP, Respondent
Rick L. Peterson — Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara, LLP, Respondent