Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's decision in this case conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Hernandez v. Mesa?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : Does he RE Arto se arstholion Appyy 4, be othe US. Court Agel ond fer felewtr’s Carcerck Cour $ 5) Chs be US SE oat Is Te He Fh Cres Court Soest , verter ae be Court ode NO Seal & ig Upsrted Sletes OF US SS 2) cave LS. Gort Appeals “ag GE Coser Coat’ TES dns vost {order troy ti Tete ad ie Oe geakarized Unsigned Docerment &S Cons pgottere! $ 4) Cn he Creu Count <& Appeal lst 2. Agel Soc mows us AK Ne go denta hear Reis Aonrye ® A uyeck && hebes S yi Cust fess ACHES Coe! | = cov Fate | Sedys) violele WSCom shifatiowe! (S) & At
2024-05-20
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2024-04-30
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-04-06
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2024-03-04
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-05
Waiver of right of federal respondent to respond filed.
2023-12-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 5, 2024)