No. 23-641

Daisy Miller v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-12-14
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-defense criminal-procedure due-process independent-investigation ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel investigation-failure trial-counsel witness-testimony
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-01-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether trial counsel's near total reliance on the defendant's characterization of proposed defense witnesses' testimony, and the failure to conduct meaningful, independent investigations of those witnesses, is Constitutionally ineffective

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The questions presented are: Whether trial counsel’s near total reliance on the defendant’s characterization of proposed defense witnesses’ testimony, and the failure to conduct meaningful, independent investigations of those witnesses, is Constitutionally ineffective. Whether trial counsel’s failure to call known, available witnesses, other than the defendant herself, whose testimony would have directly rebutted the prosecution’s evidence against the defendant, is Constitutionally ineffective. i

Docket Entries

2024-01-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
2023-12-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2024)

Attorneys

Daisy Miller
Walter Dale MillerWalter Dale Miller, Esq, Petitioner
Walter Dale MillerWalter Dale Miller, Esq, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent