Whether the United States Eastern District of MI Court erred in granting Respondents qualified immunity after voiding civil case No. 2:01-cv-71352, disregarding facts and evidence supporting the complaints with fraud upon the court and obstruction of justice

No question identified. : QUESTION Whether the United State Eastern District of MI Court Errored when granting Respondents in civil cases No. 2:01-cv-71353, and Case No. 2:02-cv-71696, Qualified Immunity after voiding, civil case No. 2:01-cv-71352, disregarding facts, and all supporting evidence supporting those complaints with Fraud upon the Court, and Fraud on the Court, Obstruct Justice and Separate Applicants from the Equal Protection Clause, of the 14** Amendment establish an act of Corruption? To properly answer the question, it calls for this Court to carefully read, and review facts as presented in this signed sworn affidavit “Writ of Mandamus” being supported by evidence, not seen nor heard of since they were voided, 22 years ago by Judge Hood, and Respondents, Attorneys, and their Law Firms. REQUEST OF THE COURT Under Rule 20.1, this case creates the exceptional circumstances needed for this Court to mandate the Writ sought by Applicants for invalidating the lower Courts mandates of finality of judgements because facts, and evidence shows, Respondents violated the law on, April 6 1998, and the lower court’s closed this case when both never addressed nor reviewed neither the facts, or the evidence of this case that creates exceptional circumstances for granting, Mr. and Mrs. Raimondo, as the Petitioners, our continued request for the return of our extorted real estate properties known as, 74555 Fulton Armada, Mi. 48005, and the monetary relief of 32.5 Million Dollars because the lower Courts closed those options with “mandates”. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals stance against the presented facts, and evidence in support of this Wirt of Mandamus over the twenty two year history of this ongoing litigation over April 6" 1998, shows a pattern of practice of defiance for Petitioners civil right as, “White, Evangelical Christians, Conservatives, and Republicans” in its refusal to accept facts and evidence showing Fraud on the Court ii over twenty the last two years to wear Petitioners out, with threats of sanctions, which amount to little more than dilatory tactics to “delay and obstruct justice by preventing the law from working equally these pro se litigants over, April 6 1998. Petitioners were in the prime of life building their twenty year business in the “Auto Restoration, Custom Car, and Muscle Car Industry” having on the morning of, April 6t 1998, a promising future in what has become a 18.77 billion U.S. dollar industry, Respondents had no authority to interfere with. Whereby asking for 32.5 Million Dollars for our losses is a modest award when taking into account those twenty years, and adding the following twenty five years, Petitioner has worked tirelessly in the Courts to address how the law was violated on April 6 1998, and how those violations are being covered up in the Courts by officers of the Court. The United States is the world’s largest market for classic cars with revenue of between 14 and 15 billion U.S. Dollars generated in 2020. Some models from the 1950’s have become cultural icons of America’s post war golden era. The classic car market in the United States is projected to grow to some 18.77 billion U.S. dollars by 2024. Mr. Raimondo was a member of this industry, Respondent took from me!