No. 23-642

Kevin Scott Karsjens, et al. v. Jodi Harpstead, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-12-14
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process federal-courts implied-waiver legal-standard professional-judgment waiver
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether federal courts have a duty to apply the correct legal standard to a due process claim or can the court apply the wrong legal standard based on an implied waiver?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether federal courts have a duty to apply the correct legal standard to a due process claim or can the court apply the wrong legal standard based on an implied waiver?

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent Jodi Harpstead, et al. to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-12-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2024)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Jodi Harpstead, et al.
Aaron E. Winter — Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Respondent
Aaron E. Winter — Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Respondent
Kevin Karsjens, et al.
Daniel E. Gustafson — Gustafson Gluek, PLLC, Petitioner
Daniel E. Gustafson — Gustafson Gluek, PLLC, Petitioner