Did GeaGrouw? Pricate risen New) Caste Cocectianal Fact itnet Won, wo Lb Olan Violole Peta ver

Doe CCocass bY {a isePvinG Ged 6d OFFiar O. Predericiis Mave dcwn as A wrtness when re never ues Presast OS eaMness lhe eurdearce record Febructy 3, 2021 91S Aen.

Senerou? OFhcer 9. Fedencks cave. dassnas A wwAlness fOP. lla Corduct Adiustmest Boted Tyrove Tromas. Adminislectue 5,0. Fdch, 1 wd Farol Rates J.Litle ciolede Petitiouer due Process 5Y WING Seb Wordins LRaatl as Plaved aPoct sade fLbnccknb eyndetco recod © by weitine Ges Grode OFFiar N. Frechecicls Adve Gaon AS Ce Wilress of tre. weckan Tebructy 3, 292) 416A.

Pecsoual Poremty uve 4i20Z/ NOP. 108. Ad. a Aud ACP.12a. LL Optlaw email aver 30 Pearle Fanos 3.2OZI IY Bam. do in Pluesce Lhe Golly PD dineas tre ematl Pt Gt of , dicipliucty Prow@edinos b4 Lorduct adSustmast Bored Tove Thomas wWyhroldine excsladory eu/dleuce. to Pett onets dad rot Presauled by Tidiou. Adorned Gevered Dawid OQhse Ace. !3a. *Pethsner ablain ematl 00 daaweny te-Jastertra rier v. Gord eter. &Lidouts D.5.0isF Com EQ cv SWNSSEB TAB™

Did lke Oaded Steles Dideict Gooch ector in law By Stobab euideoce inte toe perard +o smelt Guilty Sidias Sat Kad bd Le Ooflow Plated Cote immcradiche SPONSISONS LGA aWas de venvcradi cle SPENdiSAC, falseVine Gea Crone OfRicoc N.fredemeiis Nave con las @ Witness Uren he never Was Prepat otusttress dre eu Dla ICR fELOMO Dd LE Octlaw email Quer 20 PeORe_ ESN 3,292) L¥eam. to inecos Bory Hudine on QetAamer AR LOA Axd.llar &e- Ita Md WPI Onided Seles Com dudée Pichad L. ING eoror in Las een Oatitvaner Juns never riGcoled a imeaical Berisi0n Maier bY Conduct About cra sk BORD Trove Tamas » frelissa. Pu

Did the United States District Court err in law by failing to consider exculpatory evidence in the record