No. 23-6425

Christopher Daniel Taylor v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: brady-v-maryland brady-waiver criminal-procedure criminal-proceedings direct-appeal due-process fifth-amendment plea-agreement sentencing sentencing-phase
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-the-fifth-amendment's-due-process-clause-permits-courts-to-find-a-plea-agreement-waiver-that-is-silent-as-to-brady-v-maryland-constitutes-a-knowing-and-intelligent-waiver-of-brady-claims-on-direct-appeal

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1 Whether the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause permits courts to find a plea agreement waiver that is silent as to Brady v. Maryland, 873 U.S. 83 (1963), constitutes a knowing and intelligent waiver of Brady : claims on direct appeal, thereby removing Brady’s due process protections \ from the sentencing phase of criminal proceedings. \ | | | i LIST OF

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-08
Motion (23M47) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record Granted.
2023-12-13
MOTION (23M47) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-12-07
Motion (23M47) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed.
2023-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 7, 2024)

Attorneys

Christopher Daniel Taylor
Bradley D. PriceDentons Davis Brown PC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent