whether-a-supplemental-final-judicial-report-violates-the-ohio-and-u.s.-constitutions

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW CitiMortgage, Inc.’s invalid Supplemental Final Judicial Report should be declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court; thus, the questions presented for review are: i) In violation of § 524(a) and § 1326(c) and Rule 9011 and O.R.C. § 2329, whether a Supplemental Final Judicial Report violates the Ohio and U.S. Constitutions and the 5 and 8" and 14% Amendments for allowing a per se taking of a home? Isn’t the public interest affected? ii) Isn’t left for this Court to block a Supplemental Final Judicial Report that allowed a per se taking of a home and that allowed a conflicting decision with other Courts’ decisions on the same issues of § 524(a) and to enforce void judgments to collect discharged personal debts? Isn’t a per se taking? iii