No. 23-6438

Jean Jocelyn Merilien v. Andrew McFarlane, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process exculpatory-evidence exhaustion habeas-corpus prosecutorial-misconduct standing trial-disclosure
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-03-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Eleventh Circuit erred in concluding that Petitioner's Rule 60(b)(6) motion did not satisfy the requirements for relief under that rule

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4. did tha cleeNh circwh Bre sd reads AY of Prose. Plainhfl's Rule. 600) (&) 4nd Kuta. bok EG) moon do Re ORnI c bY concluin§ +hak KES aIHS Dnsments Pail Undec Rife 600A) nndt ak He fabless Shovrek obue Ai Gence Exeveixe iv, comly cf Inf Wa Shake. Lovet chek tor whence and nbovrckan to boos bistufet LOMF hid Shile inmate chVil nctionl ConnB lait an Beret te Froceed py} saiGrvae Fated wee tnrelt ¢@d wWestak. covr HL 2Xhauihuan) Af ad nishecn ue Ce ects Ce dd es SAheublues Og Skdes, 2. Dib the eleventh Cirewth eger sn concluclany thal péPelant's Rite. bob) (2) CLO D&tyéct Courk ur thon, 67 des atte. Tulimeat eaketec wed wiahowLy By flab fo SHdusech #2. hack eKxercae® due DY Gee. iA) Obie ek ev ol nte beets cor FS Ke Lek SAR the chré evidence gufiaeny pros I&O Cove Remehas gant fute boh@) Huarhvont Chow hore. Your wits nok exgtnek wher! He tile the withodl 1, Keopeni pnde Kele be Epanrk@, wh: a Lim} ynher Buck V. bays, 13%8-cf 757 (208) | 3. Ff Rule bo WES catch All FeV Ons al Curt athe Reckorss Tushify Ketek cue not fell nd mteusly Ovidence. When ov Pouty Receive the evhente AF FE ay oo tay WhY Laled Catch ell,fr0Vis nas yal wer Srnice 6 me Lin§ na) Toa Onle Year edie lnbdabn hee pans TF Was conrectly SOAKING ROP CE, le Did the steverth ciccurth Ber IRANRS A tonthhles tha when peadunle’ aseed Jo Removechte (08 e Stake inmate. citi l ackor tort and LAusc& 1963 suit from She coot with acknowlefjedt (Doc.L ab 4.) fhale ThE cad€ wes GeLin Siete cod orl &/aS 20% which DUS isdluys af lec EX hapten ert witte tinela 80 W oe) feplece cour us Katiovledieas sobeangtant murvedids priser ia on) 8/y/bajz Me NoOfare : I : QusSTbon| PRESENTE BonTroue . S. whether Rule 60K) EG) airflow zes reli ek ON Sroaivd Meusly eu, deAce, thn, On Exercise Aue Ai, Gence and. Shoo a Kha ondinan? Lircumcdte wv les. 6. whelh&e Distadctcouvt evnad 1A PALAT Yo consiibred Srankind APCella nts Nabe akal Peal ON In kuna Hueo’s (LPP AS Indi Stat brsePonl Pridn over Grantiad fe L stake cart (su Cow carrt IF TOANDAN CaAvVATVS OPT eanGe 8YQnhal IMbrnnce MAYPELLS 40 Proceed, iS Ppwse actoan on G2 Loe IP See onde RGA Mp hing @ctonl eased da! 8/28,23]4etA eet ed ec AS App ek G, HORA POPES POC LBA AL PORE 34) g2e 0.0CG. AS FLO 2 @) ; y LG > A 2. Whethow sleverth chncurt evned iattaclind he Seed Prose, AEM MH ITEPY Afel babded oa) Cissy Shi coot onde greeiingtsgp ofa procked Hh thon) ON court see Fup CAR Gs JOR ak puges-D | | iy |

Docket Entries

2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-01-24
Waiver of right of respondent Andrew Warden, McFarlane to respond filed.
2023-12-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 8, 2024)

Attorneys

Andrew Warden, McFarlane
Stephen John PetranyGeorgia Department of Law, Respondent
Stephen John PetranyGeorgia Department of Law, Respondent
Jean Merilien
Jean J. Merilien — Petitioner
Jean J. Merilien — Petitioner