No. 23-6439
Jennifer Lynn Mothershead v. Deborah Jo Wofford, Superintendent, Washington Corrections Center for Women
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2254 appellate-review comity habeas-corpus merits-determination procedural-bar state-court-ruling
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision violates Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255 (1989) and the bedrock habeas corpus principle of comity
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision violates Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255 (1989) and the bedrock habeas corpus principle of comity by treating a state’s highest court’s ruling, which affirms the lower court ruling on state procedural grounds and on the merits, as only being a merits determination reviewable under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)? i
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent Deborah J. Wofford to respond filed.
2023-01-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 9, 2024)
Attorneys
Deborah J. Wofford
Peter Benjamin Gonick — Attorney General of Washington, Respondent
Peter Benjamin Gonick — Attorney General of Washington, Respondent
Jennifer Lynn Mothershead
Marla Leslie Zink — Luminata PLLC, Petitioner
Marla Leslie Zink — Luminata PLLC, Petitioner