No. 23-6444
David D. Madriz, Jr. v. Adam Aron, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: chancery-court civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process extraordinary-circumstances interlocutory-appeal standing stockholder-litigation supreme-court-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Supreme Court of Delaware failed to follow Delaware Chancery Court's procedures
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: Does a non-frivolous appeal of the denial to consider a Motion equal to other Motions a violation of Petitioner’s Constitutional rights? Related Cases: ® Delaware Supreme Court: AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc., et al. Case No.: 258; 2023 e Chancery Court: AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. et al., Stockholders’ Litigation, Consol. Civil Action No.: 2023-0215-MTZ
Docket Entries
2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-01
Waiver of right of respondents Allegheny County Employees' Retirement System, Anthony Franchi to respond filed.
2024-01-25
Waiver of right of respondents AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. Adam M. Aron, et al. to respond filed.
2023-08-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Allegheny County Employees' Retirement System, Anthony Franchi
Michael J. Barry — Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Respondent
Michael J. Barry — Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A., Respondent
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. Adam M. Aron, et al.
John A. Neuwirth — Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Respondent
John A. Neuwirth — Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Respondent