No. 23-6447

Samuel Sherman v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause confrontation-right criminal-joinder criminal-procedure prejudice prejudicial-error rule-14 rule-14-procedure sixth-amendment zafiro-precedent zafiro-v-united-states
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower courts misapplied this Court's holding in Zafiro v. United States

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the lower courts misapplied this Court's holding in Zafiro v. United States, 506 U.S. 534, 113 S.Ct. 933 (1993), and the requirements of Rule 14, F.R.Crim.P. in a way that prejudicially violated Sherman's Sixth Amendment right of confrontation. i

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 9, 2024)

Attorneys

Samuel Sherman
Jeffrey Marx Rosenzweig — Petitioner
Jeffrey Marx Rosenzweig — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent