No. 23-6447
Samuel Sherman v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause confrontation-right criminal-joinder criminal-procedure prejudice prejudicial-error rule-14 rule-14-procedure sixth-amendment zafiro-precedent zafiro-v-united-states
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower courts misapplied this Court's holding in Zafiro v. United States
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the lower courts misapplied this Court's holding in Zafiro v. United States, 506 U.S. 534, 113 S.Ct. 933 (1993), and the requirements of Rule 14, F.R.Crim.P. in a way that prejudicially violated Sherman's Sixth Amendment right of confrontation. i
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 9, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent