Shannon R. Thomas v. United States
~T rx necson \\ YjL. 4V-< l peY\Vov\e,r do noV qut^V^y ©f VkiV under We AVH (£j(2J((l) penoVV/ enVc^n^emenV ccoa . VWe —'O irsvrVuV Ooudc, sV\VY covwieV-VVe dedeneGvnl* under" VK^, « US>vG^ ^ 3lH £L)(t) uAAVooV juncUeMon^
~3, S'\ntc 0v\W Covvaeess ccx^\ moX-t neMdaeos coacL Ccj^q^css AwWecl <UH FUsVSdp AeA- Gee 3A, TdDl* Vo W/f^X Vo r^epenV ofVmdters V <v SoWauenYAud^i^enV- d^cV- '0»$VncVC© loudttl AodsddcVon under WVb sU^ecUon render^ VVxe Oudg^enV Vo ^oonfe Sy ^ tlj 17) 3 ly 35 35 vov-A*
^If<^<A«ftr\dUiAV H^VV^peVWlo^r u><xs Se^er**-ArvWlor (Xwv Vtnt oVVr Ovwes«> Stay*cL Wu fArsVUep Wo /aiwy _'H'xclv vnecvw ^Vx^oLeW^f'c^ f-eovp AW benefit (?r^tviu) loo6><3 +Ve. mw lone? Apply Vo VKem uAVWV \Vht\vy fecVo^eAVe i SWe~ 'peWoner ttoV /VSSWoYWw W VecLereJ^ custody by ^-vv mode \ouY- swv a s^coft c-eAV evncl uocvS negWc-Ud. oV y\^ed*fi^rCAvf€_ render dUAW^vc' .iKdi^JPer^t csj^eVcrot-V^ uau SwrA pon^SVvvxenV y\bU\r ■V^oa oV deVev\cUi/vV or pr^sonec ^-vwe^menV and- 5 oVeVy ^ rfoVeVfe^ Ou-w oVcovfe. under Federal SWVu-e ' Lh$/y HOH^ (/yj,®) federal Qr^Sowws r\Y,lvV c\v\ck CorreeVow C>Wc.er £w\d. . W-ecUcoA. SWvVf OoVVes » 6 of do We «,Wi or acvA Vie «rxsV^ L cawptUjjw ft.for composi vonMertUcvse under t>bo ot (£0 KljW w\cLW>
Whether a person who does not qualify for relief under the First Step Act can be convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) without jurisdiction