Whether the police officer's warrantless trespassing on the petitioner's private property was justified, and whether the petitioner's subsequent request for government assistance in prosecuting the officer constituted the petitioner's right to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property, as well as the right to enforce contracts

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ss and he iliegailyvwas calied to the neighbors address by a non-resident there then, as when he trespassed on my ceal property he saw no unlawful activity in prog ress to justify trespassing on private property to claim to warrant trespassing then without any warrant? 12) When per 11 above, I petitioned the Federal Government for hekp prosecuting the cop andzfor trespassing criminaily.by the extortionist, did that seeking help fron government constitute my right tovthe [full and equal benefit of all lawszand prore edings for the securityuef persons and property] as well as [enforce contracts], . above, 42USC§§1981, 19827 13) Per Questions 10,41, 12 above, will the SCOTUS actually uphold/enforce the laws of the United States they write of as [all actsof aliconspirators in anycrime] until the iast one conspirator is captured and brought to trial and adjudicated. by law, that theconspiracy goes on until then? 14) Does the Federal Government have the constitutional authority to exceptions from the same requirements o£ obeying the laws [which shall be made ;in pursuance] to claim a "substantial" or “legitimate” governmental inte