No. 23-6462

Arthur Harris v. New Rez, LLC, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process jurisdiction legal-procedure patent separation-of-powers standing supreme-court takings writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference: 2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court's decision against the petitioner is unconstitutional and a violation of the United States Constitution

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; | AiTMought+ Dicla tn Te Court 6F Apeeals decisic7 I This Case, 1S Their Ieimbie Cage That They ed Again st Pel Jron)en~ 1S 4UNCon stidiangl 19 Violation OF The “VMited Stades Constitutisneg | Ss . epevation 6f Powe, Clause, especially So, because NOV The Supreme Couct oF Co VS rESS KNade Ho Such Yule \efore Hand-and Did The Disdvict Court AHS The Court of Appeals in This C4s.@, Deny Pelitisner Due Pro cess of Law then Thoy Failed To address many oF his Clamies Set Form In his opening brief because of That Kin ble Case Decision, and did The Court oF Appeals ic. pre imdb te Case Oectsien Conflict wir, Gl | OF Th OTher Ci-tuuts OF in wens OR HIS Same Pointe.

Docket Entries

2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2023-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2024)

Attorneys

Arthur Harris
Arthur Harris — Petitioner
Arthur Harris — Petitioner