No. 23-6464

Michael Edward Aguilar v. Ryan Thornell, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review certificate-of-appealability constitutional-interpretation criminal-appeal criminal-code due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment state-law statutory-ambiguity timeliness
Key Terms:
Arbitration
Latest Conference: 2024-02-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the dismissal of a criminal appeal as untimely violates the Due Process Clause and the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel when the defendant was denied a certificate of appealability for filing a notice of appeal out of time due to counsel's failure to timely file the notice

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \d ats crbdtlelue 0 tHe Gertie ler elSrlisSAL Of Crinalacé AP Ccperion mt A Aer oe thEeAs CORMAS, ite wlted Cikolyy €efilsdo -0 soue tle, Audicae A CeeeicAte oF APPEALAB LAITY FoR Fitlila ww <od ater kien oF KEASON Ud\lo Flo 1 vetarAele deta le veteran ses A Valin clair oF HE eK ae OF A Colesrrrikiolae ger tle Har Udtiets of — tepsod yokuo Kilo 0 wetpernele dette He winThier coder yas Char Ww owe veneolerl elude, cecture whe aor ate AelLare coders pivinla eNO / \olldo A caries OF AP rel AeLir brio Utint@e eciee ol a alaLouols When 0 «her o¢ Veiriglee's, Wilete ibe nlite Gear velo collec eeonedo wee ewe dssistadee Oh Pibila co heed we coven Deles tec pelecs putt cee Alale Shwe, Noe v, Prema le ao, WE ULO (An Gk. ZOO). bb wabrnta te, Nalwes eeaesy FoR A cRRiRicAre oF AKelABILTY, age nlake Ctalr reves oer “Upsets” wo & dove OMA ~er 0 bE Aepeesso ex athe Coler, cosseswla ik Clerlrs oF tar dlsel: (0) -~Aie cileroer oF xia $ cee vrlale Khod colce titodadl colerOLOR: DD Reo ubsedoretuuna lroeHaTi rere. Fead ale Qlode ol A \iWweo AS Hetree’, ) slergecsile le cee edale earlee —nlad wrreacdile tie Goverdrtertt's Yerr Duress yuk athe elo doe resrirlot re Nerala Coler of Nereus Kudo Weal 10 wet as UAtrless Bteok le Boosiod hw Ahoale of A all —ilgaledt dentine sestinoner, (AY venta Kesrobiole FoR —He of0LAM of le. Aeiiae § cee Cole CosT-THAL AIOE Ge wa © ¢eriled ple PHole 70 CoLice, Alo (S) reno. HE Diees ‘Ser wlolt Amend -0 cHe stoliatrae Alale Ei ele WA COL AEAL Kaien Tee COler eRiceco Wa, Me dee alestion crests wl ahs cise Were. WN jenlventa aeae Coleleee Lhrols LIES Ave sleseatelr cver-de, rile nina Citable, dl cabrnte Ferriolers Feqlesr cok A CERTIFI OF APEALABLiN, euregictt Wdodtdwles de etulurce wer "CAP alu we | wiartrs qlar AN Acalsao veto Hie vie CiaiT 10 bE eereccando ex CenhcaLl cole & er Fe tHe Post ¥uIMWE KOR er atrecrs tho Belt <o Asseer Any OM Warkrs Ye ar HAN", dees Snes vi. Ceahe to Us, GIR, WS4 GAA), Ade Leer opel A Fidkeotawok ALL ae coleeowwes . , wi

Docket Entries

2024-02-26
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2024-01-24
Waiver of right of respondent David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al. to respond filed.
2023-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2024)
2023-09-13
Application (23A238) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until November 12, 2023.
2023-09-01
Application (23A238) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 13, 2023 to November 12, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.
Amy M. ThorsonOffice of the Attorney General State of Arizona, Respondent
Amy M. ThorsonOffice of the Attorney General State of Arizona, Respondent
Michael E. Aguilar
Michael Edward Aguilar — Petitioner
Michael Edward Aguilar — Petitioner