Can the disparity in Guideline ranges for offenses involving substance containing methamphetamine and those involving a pure methamphetamine be considered as an extraordinary and compelling reason warranting reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(1)(A) after the sentencing commissions changes on Nov. 1, 2023?

Is the Sixth Circuit abusing its discretion by relying on the purity equals culpability scheme for the 10-to-l methamphetamine disparity if abuse of discretion occurs when a district relies on erroneous findings of fact. United States v Pembrook, 609 F 3d 381, 382 (6th Cir. 2010).

Whether the disparity in Guideline ranges for offenses involving pure methamphetamine and those involving a mixture of methamphetamine can be considered as an extraordinary compelling reason warranting reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582