No. 23-6467

Fairly W. Earls v. Salam Syed, et al.

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-law genuine-issues-of-dispute jury-function rule-of-orderliness summary-judgment supremacy-clause
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-03-15
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals committed errors of constitutional law by failing to follow the Supremacy Clause and the Rule of Orderliness on summary judgment when there were genuine issues of dispute presented by the plaintiff

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED rage ISSUE 1. Whether the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals committed error's 11 of Constitution Law by failing to follow the Supremacy Clause of the Federal Constitution and the Rule of Orderliness on summary judgment when there were geniune issues of dispute presented by the plaintiff on both cases. ISSUE 2. Whether the Federal District Court committed error's of Law by 15 deciding the plaintiff's credibility and weighing the evidence which is a Jury function in a civil suit, thereby denying Earls a Trial by 12 Jurors. 2

Docket Entries

2024-03-18
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
2024-02-12
Waiver of right of respondents Salam Syed, Renee Schueler, Angela Hodge, Denise Valerius, and Rachel Pafford to respond filed.
2024-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent Timothy Deters to respond filed.
2023-11-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 12, 2024)

Attorneys

Fairly W. Earls
Fairly W. Earls — Petitioner
Fairly W. Earls — Petitioner
Salam Syed, Renee Schueler, Angela Hodge, Denise Valerius, and Rachel Pafford
Michael D MorrisWisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent
Michael D MorrisWisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent
Timothy Deters
Patrick Michael CreaghCassiday Schade LLP, Respondent
Patrick Michael CreaghCassiday Schade LLP, Respondent